Bihar officers ‘aren’t applying their mind’ on liquor law: High court | India News

PATNA: Annoyed with the way state agencies are passing stereotypical orders for confiscation or auction of confiscated vehicles Biharalcohol ban, Patna The high court commented orally on Monday that such actions by excise employees were “a clear manifestation of their lack of awareness in the implementation of the prohibition law”.
A bench of the Chief Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice S Kumarwhile listening to a series of written petitions filed by United Spirits Limited and others, directed the state commissioner to provide data for the past three months on alcohol crime arrests, social profiles of those arrested, the number of vehicles seized and released. , confiscated and pending handling before the authorities.
The court also found that the ban was certainly good, but that its enforcement was poor and heartless.
The court directed the tax commissioner to upload all of that data within a week.
The Court expressed its displeasure over the way and method of handling confiscations by the superior agency of the excise department by citing its experience when litigants approached HC solely because of the circumstances. The superior court hearing the appeal of the confiscation copied “verbally” the order of the collector.
CJ commented that appeal hearing officers simply “cut, copy and paste” lines from the collector’s order. He added that the failure of state officials to adopt such a mindset has unnecessarily increased pressure on HC. Officers who do not know how to make decisions with independent thinking are required to be trained at Bihar Judicial AcademyIt says.
CJ asked how superior officers justified sealing the houses under prohibition law for more than a year after seizing just a liter and a half of alcohol? If a collector is guilty of such factual assessment, how can his superiors assert that while sitting at the appeals forum, he asked.
Divisional benches forged officers’ indifferent approach to compliance with the state’s litigation policy.
Justice Kumar expressed displeasure at the way homes were sealed off to seize alcohol without providing any information to their landlords, a mandatory provision of the prohibition law. The petitioners went to HC for a state directive that would allow them to move the machinery of their shuttered wineries outside of Bihar.
The matter will be heard next on September 2.

Source link


News5h: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button