As you may know, Amber Heard recently stated that the jury in Johnny DeppThe defamation trial handed down an unfair verdict because they were interfered with by her famous ex.
Now, one of the jurors in the trial is protesting the actress’s actions – and offering a list of reasons they finally sided with Depp!
While talking anonymously with Good Morning AmericaThe male juror said he and the other jurors were “uncomfortable” with the way Heard stared at them throughout the trial, and they struggled to believe her as she went from “cry” to “ice cold”.
Related: Larsa Pippen Slips Into Johnny Depp’s DMs!
The man – one of five on the jury – said:
“The crying, the facial expressions, the stares at the judges… we were all very upset.. she answered a question and she would cry and two seconds later she was as cold as ice… some some of us used the expression ‘crocodile tears’.”
The man also denied Aquaman the star’s statement that it was a social media trial, noting that three of the juries didn’t even have Facebook or Twitter. He say:
“Myself and at least two other jurors do not use Twitter or Facebook. Others who have had it have made the point of not talking about it. “
As for Heard’s insinuations that But the pirate of the Caribbean The star only won because he was more popular and likeable than her, the jury said they reached a verdict based on the evidence and facts presented in the case.
He explained, adding that he personally doesn’t believe Depp ever hit Heard:
“A lot of her stories didn’t end… the majority of the jury felt that she was the aggressor… We followed the evidence.”
One of the big deciding factors for the jury was Heard’s “failure” admission that she didn’t donate her $7 million divorce settlement to charity, like she has publicly asserted that she has.
While Heard took the stance that she used the terms “commit” and “give” interchangeably, the juror pointed to another facet in which Heard is alleged to have used the terms. another to describe how she allegedly gave the money as promised. He recounted:
“She was on a talk show in the UK. The video shows her sitting there telling the landlord that she gave all the money. And the terms she uses in the video clip are ‘I gave it away’, ‘I gave it away’, ‘it’s gone’. But the reality is that she didn’t give much away. “
The jury noted that while Depp’s legal team was “sharp”, Heard had a “sharp elbow” and took the pitch too seriously, adding that he thought both sides were abusive. together. He summed it up:
“A lot of the jury felt what he was saying was, at the end of the day, more believable. He just seemed a little more real about how he answered the questions. His emotional state is very stable throughout. What I think is honest is that they insulted each other. I don’t think that makes either person right or wrong, but to raise the bar of what she has claimed, there isn’t enough evidence to actually support what she’s saying. “
As We reported, the jury ruled that Heard smeared Johnny by her 2018 opt-in washington articles in which she describes herself as a victim of domestic violence. She was ordered to pay Depp $10.4 million in punitive damages, but insisted she could not afford to pay.
Heard goes on to insist that she always tells the truth.
[Image via Law and Crime]