World

Queen’s death triggers media bonanza in works for decades


NEW YORK: When there’s that word Queen Elizabeth II Near her death, media organizations around the world came to life, dispatching reporters to a royal castle in Scotland and disrupting decades of coverage plans in progress.
At 96, the queen’s death is hardly surprising. However, the British Royal Family’s succession is a steroid media event that will culminate in Monday’s live coverage of funeral services from Westminster Abbey.
“It was something I always dreaded, both anticipated and worried about,” recalls the nights obsessing over details, said Deb Thompson, assistant chief of the London office of CBS News in the US.
So far, all has gone well and she claims to be in awe of the sight.
However, woe to those who do not plan ahead.
The director of the UK’s Foreign Press Association says the organization has received numerous requests for recognition from television and radio stations around the world. The association tries to help them navigate government and royal protocols.
Director Deborah Bonetti said: “You would have thought that the royal wedding reached the maximum level of interest, but it is not. “It’s a tsunami of people who don’t know what to do to broadcast these proceedings from London.”
Even accredited journalists are vying for places, “so if you’re just flying, you’re unlikely to get one,” she said.
Steven Barnett, professor of communications at the University of Westminster, said that within the UK, the delivery of memorials and carefully rehearsed ceremonial events was considered a mistake. Critical reflections on the queen’s life or the role of the monarchy in modern society – which have been reported around the world – have been largely banned on social media, he said.
In a tour of the carriages, The New York Times was criticized in the UK for an article that spoke of the outrageous price tag of a royal funeral paid for with state funds at a time when many Britons are suffering financial loss.
Journalist Andrew Neil, a former editor of the Sunday Times in London, said on Twitter: “There is no depth that @nytimes will not have a hand in anti-British propaganda.”
Marlene Koenig, blog manager for the Royal Musings blog from her native Virginia, says in the US, coverage is largely focused on the passing of an era and formal offerings.
“That’s very respectful,” she said. “I won’t use the term reverence. We must remember that the British monarch is a huge part of our history and heritage.”
Funeralists trying to pay their last respects to the queen as her coffin lay undisturbed this week were met with a throng of reporters, microphones and cameras as they waited to enter Westminster Hall and a again when they leave.
Why did they come? What did that moment mean to them? How do you feel when you see the coffin? Reporters asked to check the wristbands of people in line to see how many people were waiting.
On Thursday, the media’s desire to show as much as possible of mourners walking past the king’s coffin contradicted a desire for the dignity and decoration of the palace to have a sense of control.
The palace has issued a list of rules for video coverage, such as not depicting the royal family “showing visible signs of distress” or “any inappropriate behaviour”. ” by members of the public or others.
When one of the ceremonial guardians next to the queen’s coffin fainted, the BBC cut the live feed and use of video showing what happened was limited, although photographs still visible on press websites.
Many news organizations already have long-term agreements on where their journalists will be located for signed events. For example, NBC News is using the same location it used to cover King Charles III’s wedding to Diana and Prince William’s wedding to Kate Middleton.
“British pomp and circumstance like no other,” said Tom Mazzarelliexecutive producer of NBC’s “Today” show in the US.
US television stations have also been given full rights to cover the queen. TV networks are sending their biggest news stars to cover Monday’s funeral: Robin Roberts and David Muir of ABC News; Savannah Guthrie, Lester Holt and NBC’s Hoda Kotb; Gayle King and Norah O’Donnell of CBS.
Princess Diana’s funeral in 1997 was watched by a large audience: 33 million people in the United States alone on a Saturday morning.
Even without the royal family, funerals of major figures still symbolize the end of an era and are often major television attractions. The Nielsen company said the funeral of former President Ronald Reagan in 2004 was watched by 35 million people.
The queen’s death receives great attention in other parts of the world, often due to Britain’s relationship with the countries where it is shown or complicated.
In Hong Kong, a former British colony transferred to China in 1997, most local news agencies cover British ceremonies. But some TV channels have carefully covered the city’s dedication to the queen.
Now TV network edited a Facebook post and news report showing Hong Kong residents leaving flowers at the British consulate to delete an interview with a resident who said long lines were waiting to pay their respects to Mr. queen “shows what people want.”
Local media reported that the head of pro-Beijing news at Now TV ordered the change. The network gave no explanation.
Heavy information about the queen’s death in India, once the largest British colony, quickly faded. For older residents, the British royal family represents a piece of traumatic history, but for most Indians, they are just another famous family.
In Syria, where President Bashar Assad sees Britain as part of a coalition that funds rebels in the country’s 11-year conflict, state television has paid little attention to the news.
The co-host of major morning TV shows in Australia, a constitutional monarchy where the queen is sovereign, went to London to cover the events. Regular guests of the show are required to wear dark outfits.
Widespread coverage in Japan often draws parallels with increasingly controversial state funeral plans later this month for the assassinated former leader. Shinzo Abe.
Mark Lukasiewicz, a veteran US network operator who is now dean of the Hofstra University School of Communication, said British ceremonial events were “a highlight for television networks”.
But after more than a week, they have their limits, says Barnett, a British professor.
“It’s gotten to the point where a lot of people are thinking, now we’ve had enough,” he said.





Source link

news5h

News5h: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, Sports...at the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button